philip woodruff — Mar 23, 2012
Mis-informed me of the bankruptcy process literally putting me on the street! Failed to communicate properly causing mis-mailings …
Mis-informed me of the bankruptcy process literally putting me on the street! Failed to communicate properly causing mis-mailings of bankruptcy proceedings:
IN RE: Richard S. YUSEM
IN RE: Richard S. YUSEM, an Attorney at Law.
-- September 11, 1998
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on August 11, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD S. YUSEM of SOMERVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that RICHARD S. YUSEM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
RICHARD S. YUSEM
155 N.J. 595 (1998)
of Somerville (Somerset County)
Reprimand
Decided: September 10, 1998
Admitted: 1977
APPEARANCES BEFORE REVIEW BOARD
Diane K. Smith argued the cause on behalf of the District XIII (Hunterdon/Somerset/Warren Counties) Ethics Committee.
Richard S. Yusem, respondent, failed to appear.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey, on a certified record from and recommendation by the Disciplinary Review Board, held that a reprimand was the a
Read more
Mis-informed me of the bankruptcy process literally putting me on the street! Failed to communicate properly causing mis-mailings of bankruptcy proceedings:
IN RE: Richard S. YUSEM
IN RE: Richard S. YUSEM, an Attorney at Law.
-- September 11, 1998
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on Augu…
Mis-informed me of the bankruptcy process literally putting me on the street! Failed to communicate properly causing mis-mailings of bankruptcy proceedings:
IN RE: Richard S. YUSEM
IN RE: Richard S. YUSEM, an Attorney at Law.
-- September 11, 1998
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on August 11, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD S. YUSEM of SOMERVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that RICHARD S. YUSEM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
RICHARD S. YUSEM
155 N.J. 595 (1998)
of Somerville (Somerset County)
Reprimand
Decided: September 10, 1998
Admitted: 1977
APPEARANCES BEFORE REVIEW BOARD
Diane K. Smith argued the cause on behalf of the District XIII (Hunterdon/Somerset/Warren Counties) Ethics Committee.
Richard S. Yusem, respondent, failed to appear.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey, on a certified record from and recommendation by the Disciplinary Review Board, held that a reprimand was the a
Read more
Show less
